Comments on: Clone Wars

By: any

any — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:03:15 +0000

Why UGG Boot is So Popular? Ugg boots, also spelled ugh boots and ug boots, are a style of sheepskin boot, with wool as the inner lining and a tanned outer surface worn by both men and women. Ugg boots often have a synthetic sole, although this is not universal. Uggs are popular with the teenage set, worn by girls with mini skirts, leggings, and with jeans tucked into the boots. UGGS Boots are also popular with boys, wearing jeans or tracksuit bottoms inside them most commonly. UGG UK Sale, In Australia and New Zealand, sheepskin boots have long been popular with people in rural occupations, such as sheep shearers, who have ready access to the raw materials,. Their popularity increased as a result of World War I and World War II, when they were popular with aviators, because of their need to keep warm in non-pressurized planes at high altitudes. An exhibit of a WWI aviator's outfit in the Canadian War Museum cites the term "fug" boots. UGG Cardy, Ugg Boots have also been popular with surfers and competitive swimmers since at least the 1960s, for keeping warm while out of the water. The terms ugg boots, ugh boots and ug boots have been used as generic terms for sheepskin boots in Australia since 1950s and 1960s, when they first appeared in advertising and other publications. The natural properties of sheepskin results in thermostatic benefits. Thick fleecy fibres on the inner part of the boots allows air to circulate and keep the feet at body temperature. Synthetic and faux fur boots do not have these properties and sheepskin boots are highly prized for their effectiveness. Ugg boots are designed to be worn without socks in order to maximize the benefits of sheepskin. What’s more, This Year’s Hottest UGG Boots Style--UGG Bailey Button Boots, is already starting to sell well. UGG UK Sale, it is not a matter of if this style sells out, but how quickly. Every year people procrastinate and then they can't find the Ugg Boots they want. So, Shop early for the best selection.

By: Administrator

Administrator — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:16:32 +0000

Thanks for the tip, Rich!

- M2

By: richiepear

richiepear — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:23:43 +0000

Ditto on your assessment of Keen’s book – if you listen to him, today’s Internet is responsible for high oil prices, childhood obesity and the traffic on highway 101 . . . hmmm . . .strike that last comment as it probably is.

Anyways, in reference to your Clone Ranger title, I wanted to point you to a couple of anti-cloning devices. You have probably heard of /tried copyscape – it’s simple to use and publishers can use it to see where their content is being copied.

The other device is admittedly self-serving – Attributor – where I work. We perform the basic functions that Copyscape does in the form of a web service plus we provide the context of the cloning, including where the cloning site is making money off your content, the amount that has been cloned and where the cloning site ranks in Search Engines. We’re live with text monitoring, and will be adding images and video shortly.

End shameless plug, but I thought it would be useful to share this with the network.

Rich Pearson, Clone Finder

By: NotSoGood

NotSoGood — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:48:08 +0000

Before starting a holy war against cloned content, YPN should focus on its own problems.
Ads not showing.
When showing, they are far to be context matched. Much more a simple word matching.
Poor ads text. Some advertisers publish misleading ads landing on very poor pages.
Very low pool of advertiser. Same ads shows over and over.
Smart pricing. we where looking for something innovative in the PPC business. Ypn ended up with a shameless copy of adsense’s smartpricing.
I’ll tell ya what’s a good experience for everyone.
Advertisers wants to make money. They way they do it is relative. If they do not like the ROI of a ppc campaign, they better switch to PPA instead of complaining and whining about publishers. If i buy a page on the NY Times, and try to sell a crap product or my commercial sux and i get no ROI, do I get a refund? I guess NO, so why it’s different on the internet?

Publishers wants to make money. The only way they have, is show ads (PPA, PPC Affiliate) praying Lord that the ads or banner will be interesting for their audience. So far publishers have a very little control on what ads will be on their sites. This is frustrating and not fair.
A good innovation would be ad filtering by keywords, geolocation, domain, and regexp. Example: if I sell carburettors, it’s so hard to filter ads like “show automotive spare parts but not carburettors?”
Why a publisher have to check all his pages and manually block competitor’s ads? And what about localized ads they will never see?
If I sell used boats in FL I will never see ads of someone selling boats in CA,right? Do you think that’s fair?
Come on YPN you have been in beta for a while now but still you have a lot to work on.

One of your publisher who ran out of patience.

By: infocrystals

infocrystals — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:05:07 +0000

yes thats true about the content, how to avoid it, even big search engines like Yahoo and google are having problems on the content, but its difficult to control copying the content.