<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Rising Tide</title>
	<link>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tanveer</title>
		<link>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>tanveer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Hello every one here!!
i have my website name by tangraphics.com &#38; i hv placed google adds on that but now i want to tranfer it to yahoo adds is it possible because am not american &#38; i am from Pakistan!!!
Please answer me so that i will decide what to do??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello every one here!!<br />
i have my website name by tangraphics.com &amp; i hv placed google adds on that but now i want to tranfer it to yahoo adds is it possible because am not american &amp; i am from Pakistan!!!<br />
Please answer me so that i will decide what to do??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLeggett</title>
		<link>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>DLeggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>It sounds great, but I would love a deeper look into the update.

I guess from what I see, this is a huge advantage for advertisers, as they will be able to "better connect" with their consumers.  However, I am drawing fewer conclusions between the benefits with publishers.  Will this new system give the advertisers and publishers ways to communicate?  Will the advertisers be given the option to pay extra for "highly qualified clicks".

I am a believer that it is important for the advertiser to be happy, since they are the component that basically makes this system work, and I do see some small benefits for the publishers, but it sounds like Yahoo Search Marketing is holding something back from the whole story that will help explain more of what is going on.  

Whatever it turns out to be, I am looking forward to the update! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds great, but I would love a deeper look into the update.</p>
<p>I guess from what I see, this is a huge advantage for advertisers, as they will be able to &#8220;better connect&#8221; with their consumers.  However, I am drawing fewer conclusions between the benefits with publishers.  Will this new system give the advertisers and publishers ways to communicate?  Will the advertisers be given the option to pay extra for &#8220;highly qualified clicks&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am a believer that it is important for the advertiser to be happy, since they are the component that basically makes this system work, and I do see some small benefits for the publishers, but it sounds like Yahoo Search Marketing is holding something back from the whole story that will help explain more of what is going on.  </p>
<p>Whatever it turns out to be, I am looking forward to the update! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary R. Hess</title>
		<link>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary R. Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ypnblog.com/blog/2006/05/08/a-rising-tide/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Sounds good, just wish it came sooner than Q3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good, just wish it came sooner than Q3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.463 seconds -->
